TWO WORDS - NON SENSE

From: yinsay@aol.com [mailto:yinsay@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 3:20 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients
Subject: Questions About Investigations



Hello, I would like to make an appointment to speak with someone about the previous
complaints I have made. I was told by Ms. Lau, whom I met at the receiving station
when I was there last, that I would have to speak to the investigating officer.

She told me some disturbing things, such as, the investigating officer wouldn't necessarily interview the officer in question , or review the camera tapes.

I found this surprising because I made a complaint about my statements not being included with the reports I made at the receiving station.

I also thought it ill-advised to question me about the complaint within earshot of the other officers at the receiving station, that were not Internal Affairs officers.

I would also like to know what is meant by the wording on the disposition letter.
I paraphrase: "allegations could not be substantiated".


Vernon Balmer Jr.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

RE: Questions About Investigations
From: Mizuo, Janna L.
jmizuo@honolulu.gov To: yinsay@aol.com
Date: Fri, Aug 28, 2009 4:32 pm

Sir, the information given by Det. Lau is correct. Please be specific about the case you are referring? Thank you.



Janna Mizuo, Major

Internal Affairs

Honolulu Police Department

801 S. Beretania Street

Honolulu, HI 96813

(808)529-3286

jmizuo@honolulu.gov

SOS

SAME OL' SHTUFF

THE OFFICER'S REPORT IS IN. AGAIN THERE IS NO STATEMENT INCLUDED WITH THE REPORT.

THE REPORTING OFFICER IS JOSE MARTINEZ, ALTHOUGH I AM GIVEN THE NAME OF ANOTHER OFFICER - TAMAMOTO TO INQUIRE OF, ABOUT THE STATEMENT.

NO WAY JOSE'

THE REPORT I MADE TO OFF. JOSE MARTINEZ, 06/16, ABOUT MY TAX TRANSCRIPTS BEING STOLEN IS NOT IN RECORDS YET. THEY SAY IT'S A MATTER OF DAYS - 4 OR 5.

Contact IRS | About IRS | Site Map | Español | Help

TRUE BLUE

AN OFFICER ACTUALLY TELLS ME THE PARK REGULATIONS ARE TO GET RID OF THE HOMELESS. THIS IS NOT NEWS, BUT QUITE REFRESHING. IF ONLY THE CITY AND COUNTY HAD THE NADS.

BUT THAT WOULDN'T BE THE NORM FOR THOSE IN HAWAII WHO WANT TO BS OTHERS. LIKE I FOUND OUT ON THE JOB. PRETEXT RULES.

SOMETHING IN THE MIX AIN'T RIGHT

Man denies provoking shooting by officer
By Leila Fujimori


POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Apr 02, 2009

Police Maj. Frank Fujii said Silva launched an unprovoked attack on the officer at 5 a.m. Sunday at the Makaha 7-Eleven, punching him in the face and threatening to kill him. Just as the officer was about to black out, he reached for his handgun and shot Silva.

Silva said the officer shot him twice in the stomach, causing him to fall back, and as he lay on the ground, the sergeant shot him again in the stomach. "I said, 'Nough.'"

TALK UP, THE TASER ???

Police shoot woman on King Street
The shooting is the second this week involving an officer

By Gregg K. Kakesako

POSTED: 10:35 a.m. HST, Apr 03, 2009

One of the officers fired a Taser gun at her while the other fired two shots from his service handgun, hitting her once in the abdomen, police said.

Just two words.... UH,OH
Police Taser video clears Honolulu woman, attorney says ...Jun 20, 2009 ... Taser gun video does not support the police version of what happened before officers shot Yvonne Arsisto with the Taser and a handgun, ...
www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090620/.../RSS02?... - Cached - Similar
By Jim Dooley
Advertiser Staff Writer

But Landsberg said that on the video, Arsisto "takes 14 steps backwards" from police as one officer says to her, "We don't want anyone to get hurt."

After Arsisto said, "No one's going to get hurt here," one of the officers is heard saying, "Just shoot her already," followed by the Taser and gun shots, according to the defense lawyer.

LAW ENFORCEMENT LUNCHING

I go to the police station today and find there is still no statement with the report about my backpack being stolen. I ask for a copy of the report, and am told by the clerk, they don't give copies of reports. In the past I was given copies of reports. Coincidentally, I had some copies in the backpack that was stolen. Seems the clerk could be aware of the fact the copies are not now in my possession. This would suggest to me either the police have the backpack, or the clerk has intelligence peculiar to the situation, that the contents are no longer in my possession.

THE BIG QUESTION?
How many copies did Vernon make.